{"id":40758,"date":"2016-05-19T16:38:36","date_gmt":"2016-05-19T23:38:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bruceclay.com\/blog\/?p=40758"},"modified":"2023-03-30T11:35:28","modified_gmt":"2023-03-30T18:35:28","slug":"conduct-solid-data-driven-conversion-research-convcon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bruceclay.com\/blog\/conduct-solid-data-driven-conversion-research-convcon\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Conduct Solid, Data-Driven Conversion Research #ConvCon"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cIf I had an hour to save the world, I\u2019d spend 55 minutes identifying the problem and 5 minutes implementing the solution.\u201d \u2014 Albert Einstein<\/em><\/p>\n

You\u2019re tuned in to Conversion Conference 2016 and a presentation by Michael Aagaard<\/a> of Unbounce. He loves that quote by Einstein because it relates to CRO. The story he\u2019s going to tell today is about how we can change our mindset to just straight testing and broadening it to understanding the problem. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Conversion<\/a><\/p>\n

He starts us off viewing a landing page with lead capture form. Being a conversion optimizer, he wanted to optimize the page. He removed three of the fields on what he\u2019d call a monster form. The result was 14% lower conversions. Ouch! So next he went looking at where the drop off occurs on the form. He found which form fields had low interaction and high drop-off and addressed them by rearranging the order of the fields (putting ones that were a low commitment higher up) and tweaked label copy.<\/p>\n

\"Tweaked<\/a><\/p>\n

This time they got 19% increase in conversions.<\/p>\n

The question: why didn\u2019t he do the research right away and why did who jump to best practices?<\/strong><\/p>\n

It\u2019s very difficult to understand a problem that you don\u2019t understand. Vice versa, it\u2019s easy to solve a problem when you understand it.<\/strong><\/p>\n

He asked other conversion optimizers what keeps them from doing conversion research:<\/p>\n