{"id":38971,"date":"2021-10-19T12:45:00","date_gmt":"2021-10-19T19:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bruceclay.com\/blog\/?p=38971"},"modified":"2024-03-16T08:10:40","modified_gmt":"2024-03-16T15:10:40","slug":"google-search-quality-rating-guidelines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bruceclay.com\/blog\/google-search-quality-rating-guidelines\/","title":{"rendered":"Search Quality Rater Guidelines Checklist: Evaluator Considerations"},"content":{"rendered":"
EDITOR’S NOTE: You can always find Google’s current Search Quality Rater Guidelines here<\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n Google\u2019s update of its Search Quality Rater Guidelines shows a shifted focus on the search engine and, consequently, for SEOs. BTW, the Google PDF file name says Evaluator and not Rater… but it is Rater.<\/p>\n For years, the buzzword for search engine optimization<\/a> has been \u201crelevance\u201d \u2014 making your site the most relevant result for a searcher\u2019s query. But as Duane Forrester, our former VP of organic search operations, observed: \u201cIt\u2019s all about usefulness<\/em> today and moving forward. The goal of the search engine is simple: increase searcher satisfaction. That\u2019s why \u2018useful\u2019 is the new watchword. Previously we said \u2018relevant,\u2019 but really we all meant \u2018useful.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n <\/a>Google regularly updates its internal guidelines document that tells hired human quality raters how to evaluate sites as part of Google\u2019s ongoing experiments. We in the search industry usually get only leaked tidbits and summaries to read. But last month, in a rare gesture, Google published the guidelines as a PDF<\/a> for all to read.<\/p>\n While it doesn\u2019t reveal any ranking formulas or algo secrets, the 175-page document complete with many examples and screenshots does offer a coveted view of what the search engine considers priority<\/em>. As Google\u2019s announcement<\/a> states, \u201cthe guidelines reflect what Google thinks search users want\u201d and therefore can help webmasters and business owners \u201cunderstand what Google looks for in web pages.\u201d<\/p>\n The guidelines are not the algorithm. But they show what Google focuses on, and that\u2019s worth paying attention to.<\/p>\n What\u2019s important for business owners is not all of the nitty-gritty technical details. Leave those to your SEO. Instead, business decision-makers need to glean what Google\u2019s focus is so they can allot budgets and assign priorities correctly in a website strategy that\u2019s aligned with what Google rewards.<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n Search engine priorities change over time, and your SEO strategy has to adapt. When you compare this 2015 version to previously leaked Google quality rater\u2019s guidelines (as Jennifer Slegg does here<\/a> and here<\/a>), the differences point out how Google\u2019s focus is shifting. The two biggest changes are:<\/p>\n Here\u2019s our checklist for making sure your SEO campaign\u00a0aligns with Google\u2019s priorities.<\/strong><\/p>\n Is your site really mobile-friendly?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Earning a passing grade on Google\u2019s Mobile-Friendly Test<\/a> tool is the bare minimum required for all web pages and apps now. Beyond this, you must make sure that tasks are easy to accomplish with a mobile device. From the guidelines, here\u2019s a checklist you can use to evaluate how your site performs with a smartphone:<\/p>\n How well does your site anticipate and fulfill a mobile user\u2019s needs?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Another entirely new section added to Google\u2019s quality rating guidelines is called \u201cNeeds Met Rating Guideline.\u201d Here\u2019s the description, which is clearly targeting MOBILE users\u2019 needs (from Section 13.0):<\/p>\n Needs Met rating tasks ask you to focus on mobile user needs and think about how helpful and satisfying the result is for the mobile users.<\/em><\/p>\n To get a high quality rating in the Needs Met category, a search result and its landing page should:<\/p>\n A mobile user\u2019s intent differs from that of a desktop or even tablet user. (Tip: Aaron Levy\u2019s SMX presentation covers mobile audiences<\/a> in depth.) Evidence of this is found in the new mobile section of Google\u2019s Search Quality Rating Guidelines, where page after page of examples show what mobile users probably want when they search for various spoken or typed queries. At one point, raters are instructed to \u201cthink about mobile users when deciding if queries are [a particular type]. Use your judgment here.\u201d<\/p>\n The takeaway for mobile SEO<\/a> marketers as well as for app\/website owners is this: Think about what mobile users may be trying to do, and make sure that your site fulfills these things as directly as possible.<\/em> Google is all about satisfying mobile users\u2019 needs; you should be, too.<\/p>\n Answering this question takes some serious thought, but ultimately pays off in spades.<\/p>\n Does the webpage have a clear purpose, and how well is it achieved?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n One of the first tasks a rater must do is figure out what a webpage is for and then decide how well the page achieves that purpose. For example, the purpose of a news site homepage is to display news; the purpose of a shopping page is to sell or give information about a product; etc. Google has very different standards for different types of pages, so understanding a page\u2019s purpose lays the foundation for assessing its quality.<\/p>\n How helpful is the page\u2019s purpose?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Google wants each page to be geared to helping users. Helpfulness factors heavily into quality ratings. On the low end of the quality scale would be pages that harm or deceive users (even though they may be fulfilling their designed purpose).<\/p>\n To be deemed high quality, a page must have a helpful purpose, such as:<\/p>\n Is the purpose of the website as a whole clear, on and off site?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Make sure that your website\u2019s overall purpose is explained clearly, ideally on the About page. The rating guidelines include examples of pages with \u201cnon-obvious purposes\u201d \u2014 pages that seemed pointless or inaccurate on their own, until the rater referred to the About or FAQ page and discovered they were actually beneficial (see Section 2.2).<\/p>\n In addition, Google looks at independent sources to see whether the site\u2019s reputation matches what it claims about itself. If there\u2019s conflict, Google will tend to believe what the outside sources have to say. For small businesses or organizations, a lack of reviews or reputation information does not mean the site is low quality (see Section 2.7).<\/p>\n Does the page have quality main content?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n A webpage\u2019s main content (which excludes ads, sidebars, and other supplementary parts that do not directly fulfill the page\u2019s purpose) can earn a high quality rating if ALL of these are true:<\/p>\n There are no hard and fast rules, and no minimum number of words per page. The guidelines encourage raters to decide whether the main content fulfills the purpose of the page satisfactorily.<\/p>\n Is there any supplementary content on the page that is helpful to users?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Google recognizes that supplementary content \u201ccan be a large part of what makes a High<\/strong> quality page very satisfying for its purpose.\u201d Consider what you can include to offer related information, ways to find other cool stuff, or specialized content that could be helpful to people visiting that page.<\/p>\n How high quality are your site\u2019s YMYL pages?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Pages that can impact a person\u2019s \u201cfuture happiness, health, or wealth\u201d are known as Your Money or Your Life<\/strong> (YMYL<\/a>) pages. Google first introduced this concept in the 2014 Search Quality Rating Guidelines, which held these types of pages to a much higher standard across all quality criteria. Examples include pages for shopping transactions, financial information, medical advice, legal information, and many more.<\/p>\n Google specifies “needs met” ratings that judge how well a webpage fulfills a searcher’s needs. If you have YMYL pages, needs met<\/a> is particularly important.<\/p>\n Does your site look alive and well-maintained?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Raters are instructed to \u201cpoke around\u201d to see whether a site is being maintained. Here are a few signs of life Google expects of a well-maintained, quality website:<\/p>\n How fresh is your content?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Google\u2019s algorithm is known to look at \u201cfreshness\u201d as a ranking factor for many types of queries. When Googlebot gets to your site, does it find any recently added or updated content?<\/p>\n For blog posts and other content that is dated, don\u2019t try to game the system by setting up a program to automatically change dates to make things look recent; Google\u2019s on to that scheme. Raters are even instructed to manually check the Wayback Machine to investigate suspicious dates to see whether content is copied or original (see Section 7.4.7). By the way, Google\u2019s algorithm doesn\u2019t need the Wayback Machine to recognize original content, so don\u2019t even try to cheat.<\/p>\n A healthy website frequently adds new content and\/or updates old content to keep things fresh<\/a> and useful for site visitors.<\/p>\n How expert is your content?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n
<\/a>Aligning Your Website with Google\u2019s Priorities<\/h2>\n
\n
<\/a>Mobile, Front and Center<\/h2>\n
\n
<\/a>Needs Met or Not<\/h2>\n
\n
<\/a>Purpose-Driven Pages<\/h2>\n
\n
<\/a>Meaty Main Content and Helpful Secondary Content<\/h2>\n
\n
YMYL Pages Have Higher Standards<\/h2>\n
Maintaining Your Site<\/h2>\n
\n