{"id":21737,"date":"2012-04-27T11:37:50","date_gmt":"2012-04-27T19:37:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bruceclay.com\/blog\/?p=21737"},"modified":"2014-02-20T10:04:41","modified_gmt":"2014-02-20T18:04:41","slug":"penguins-pandas-and-spam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bruceclay.com\/blog\/penguins-pandas-and-spam\/","title":{"rendered":"Penguins and Pandas: A Black and White Issue"},"content":{"rendered":"
The news this week was that the Google \u201cover-optimization\u201d penalty that was fervently discussed over the past month or so is alive and kicking<\/a>, and goes by the name of \u201cPenguin.\u201d<\/p>\n This morning, I was chatting with Bruce, and he said:<\/p>\n Did you notice both the notable algorithm updates were named after animals of the same color?<\/em><\/p>\n To which I said:<\/p>\n That\u2019s because it\u2019s a Black Hat\/White Hat issue.<\/em><\/p>\n The lesson? Don\u2019t do spam. Plain and simple.<\/p>\n Last week, I wrote a post <\/a>about the over-dramatization and the anxiety over algorithm updates and what they mean. Every time Google makes an update, everyone wonders if SEO is dead<\/a>.<\/p>\n While we could continue to give tip after tip of how to avoid the penalties of Google\u2019s algorithm updates, the safest route is to simply stick with White Hat SEO (if you\u2019re unsure of what that means to Google, look to its SEO guide<\/a>); always trust your instinct on things that seem if-y; and be proactive about the maintenance of your site \u2013 including looking at things that may seem out of your control, like inbound links.<\/p>\n And none of this is really new<\/em> news, which is why I\u2019m not going to get into a lengthy post here. But if you want more insight on what Bruce believes is spammy in the eyes of Google and the new algorithm updates, he offers insight in this recent video:<\/p>\n